Regional Approaches to Housing and Property Restitution

The Question of Jewish Property in Arab
Countries
“More than fifty years after the holocaust, Jews around the world
continue to fight for an receive restitution for material and
non-material losses inflicted by the Nazi regime throughout Europe.
More than fifty years after the Palestinian people were displaced
and dispossessed by an exclusive Jewish state established in
Palestine in the aftermath of Nazi atrocities in Europe,
Palestinians are still being dispossessed, dispersed, and denied
any kind of restitution. Restitution is a universal human right.
Persons now fighting for restitution are therefore to be
supported.”
Petition,
‘Restitution: A Basic Human Right’
(excerpt)
One of the interesting by-products of the U.S.-U.K. led war in Iraq
and related developments in the region has been the broader
attention given to housing and property restitution in the Middle
East. Increased awareness stems from renewed claims for Jewish
losses in the Arab world.
Article 58 of the Iraqi interim constitution, developed under the
U.S.-led “Coalition Provisional Authority”, asks the transitional
government and the Iraqi Property Claims Commission to quickly
remedy previous injustices. These include altering the demographic
character of certain regions, deporting and expelling individuals
from their places of residence, forcing migration in and out of the
region and settling individuals alien to the region.
Remedies include restitution or compensation for losses suffered
between 1968 and 2003. U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell
meanwhile told a delegation from the World Jewish Congress on March
13 that he would work toward ensuring that Iraqi Jews regain their
citizenship and receive compensation for lost property.
In late March, Saif al-Islam, the son of Libyan leader Muammar
Ghaddafi stated during an interview with the Arabic satellite
network al-Jazeera, that Libya would be prepared to compensate Jews
who had lost their property in the country and welcomed Libyan Jews
to return to the country and reacquire Libyan citizenship.
These developments run parallel to increased activism by
organizations representing Arab Jews for recognition of the rights
of Jews from Arab countries. This includes Justice for Jews in Arab
Countries (JJAC) (www.jewishrefugees.org) and Jews Indigenous to
the Middle East and North Africa (JIMENA)
(www.jimena-justice.org).
Recent resolutions in the U.S. House of Representatives and Senate
call upon the Bush administration to instruct all American
diplomats, including the ambassador to the United Nations, to
include mention of ‘multiple refugee populations’ in any text or
resolution alluding to Middle East refugees, and to ensure that
“any explicit reference to the required resolution of the
Palestinian refugee issue is matched by a similar explicit
reference to the resolution of the issue of Jewish refugees from
Arab countries.” (S.Res.325, 29 March 2004)
These efforts highlight the need for strengthening regional
instruments and mechanisms to ensure that all refugees and
displaced persons in the Middle East, without any distinction,
exclusion, restriction or preference based on race, color, descent,
or national or ethnic origin, are able to repossess homes and
properties and receive compensation for damages and losses in
accordance with international law and best practice.
For more on the right of refugees and displaced persons to housing
and property restitution see, Housing and property restitution in
the context of the return of refugees and internally displaced
persons, Preliminary report of the Special Rapporteur. Commission
on Human Rights, Sub-Commission on the Promotion and Protection of
Human Rights, E/CN.4/Sub.2/2003/11, 16 June 2003.
Refugee Village Site Threatened
Plans for the expansion of Ya’ad, a Jewish colony in the Galilee
established on the lands of the Palestinian village of Mi’ar in
1975, threaten areas of the village where one can still find the
cemetery, and remains of the destroyed homes and village mosque.
More than 700 Palestinians lived in Mi’ar before their expulsion in
July 1948. Total village lands amount to some 10,788 dunums. Today,
many of the village residents are internally displaced inside
Israel. The Mi’ar Residents Committee has filed a complaint with
the District Planning Committee.
Emptying the Naqab
House demolition, destruction of agricultural land, and
colonization. This is not the West Bank or the Gaza Strip. It’s
also happening inside Israel. The indigenous Bedouin of the Naqab
are the ‘hidden’ victims of Israel’s campaign for demographic
superiority and control of land. Addressing a conference entitled,
“The Settlement of the Jews in the Negev”, organized by the Jewish
National Fund (JNF) in March 2004, Israeli Deputy Prime Minister
Ehud Olmert told the 350 participants from 34 countries, “The state
will empty the Bedouin villages so that we can settle down
thousands of Jews.”
This may include settlers from the Gaza Strip if Ariel Sharon
follows through with his plan for unilateral disengagement.
Israel’s US$ 265 million five-year plan for the Naqab (‘The
Governmental Decision Regarding the Bedouin Sector in the Negev’),
revealed in early 2003, calls for the removal of the remaining
indigenous Bedouin living in unrecognized villages, concentration
of them into 7 new townships, and transfer of Bedouin traditional
grazing and agricultural land to the state. The plan will be
accompanied by the construction of new Jewish colonies in the same
area.
House demolition and colonization
The number of Bedouin homes demolished in the Naqab increased
eight-fold in 2003. In total more than 100 homes were destroyed.
According to Israel’s Minister of the Interior, there are around
76,000 persons living in 30,000 unlicensed buildings in the
unrecognized Bedouin villages in the Naqab. If Israel’s five-year
plan is carried out, all of these will be issued demolition
orders.Palestinian villages in the Naqab are the poorest in
Israel.
At the end of January 2004, 300 members of the Israel police,
Border Police, and special forces participated in the demolition of
two homes in the unrecognized village of Um Batin, one home located
near the industrial area in Shkeib al-Salam, and a fourth home
belonging to a local journalist. Israeli forces also closed two gas
stations and confiscated more than 20,000 litres of fuel from the
owners. In early March, Israeli police and special forces destroyed
a further five homes in the Wadi al-Naim, Wadi Ghaween, and
al-Araqeeb.
At the same time that the Israeli government demolishes homes of
the poorest sector of Israeli society, government plans to increase
the number of Jews living in the Naqab continue at pace. This
includes construction of a new colony called Givot Bar located
southeast of Rahat. Givot Bar is being established with 15 Jewish
families and will be expanded to accommodate 150 Jewish families.
The colony is built on land expropriated from the al-Aqabi tribe in
1951.
The proposed ‘Wine Path Plan’ for the Naqab calls for the
construction of some 30 new ‘individual colonies’ “to fulfill the
government’s policy for development the Negev and the Galilee and
for safeguarding state land in the Negev and the Galilee.” The
colonies will affect tens of thousands of dunums of land. According
to Adalah, the plan will retroactively legalize existing illegal
individual colonies located on large parcels of land given to
Jewish citizens of Israel without a bid.
The plan stands in stark contrast to state policies towards the
Bedouin under which illegal construction is destroyed. The Jewish
National Fund (JNF), which operates as a semi-autonomous body of
the Israeli government, is currently collecting millions of dollars
to help seize and colonize land in the Naqab.
Destruction of crops
The Israel Lands Administration (ILA), which administers 93 percent
of the land in Israel – most of which was expropriated from
Palestinian refugees and citizens of the state – has continued its
policy of aerial spraying of crops planted by Bedouin in the Naqab.
The ILA claims the land used by Bedouin for grazing and traditional
rain-fed agriculture for generations is state land. On 15 January
2004, the ILA, protected by the Israel police and Border Police,
destroyed a total of 4,000 dunums of crop land in Araqiib, Mkeimin,
Sa’wa, and Khirbet al-Watan.
In mid-February ILA planes returned once again to spray crops in
the Araqiib area, ‘Arara, Za’arora, and Qatamat. Twenty people as
well as sheep were exposed to the toxic spray. One man, Salim Abu
Mdeghem, was taken to the hospital for treatment of respiratory
problems. On 9 March, Israeli authorities sprayed 3,000 dunums of
land of Qatamat and ‘Abda, two unrecognized villages. At least 17
individuals, including children, received medical treatment
following exposure to the spray.
On 23 March 2004, the Supreme Court of Israel issued a temporary
injunction, as requested by Adalah, four Arab Bedouin citizens of
Israel, and eight human rights organizations, preventing the ILA,
the Ministry of Industry and Trade, the Ministry of Agriculture or
any other entity appointed by them, from spraying agricultural
crops of the Bedouin inhabitants of the unrecognized villages in
the Naqab.
The ILA has admitted to the aerial spraying of crops with a
chemical called ROUNDUP. The label affixed to the bottle of ROUNDUP
contains many warnings to users, notably that that all physical
contact with the chemical must be avoided. It also states - "Do Not
Apply This Product Using Aerial Spray Equipment" - and that even if
the chemical is sprayed from ground level, no one should be allowed
to enter the area for seven days. The ROUNDUP label also notes that
the "level of toxicity is 4 - dangerous."
Expert opinions obtained by Physicians for Human Rights-Israel and
Adalah regarding the health risks of using ROUNDUP in aerial
spraying concluded "The evidence from research show reproductive
risks from paternal and maternal exposure in animals and paternal
exposure in humans. There is a suggestion of carcinogenic risk.” On
tests conducted on animals, different active ingredients contained
in ROUNDUP have "shown acute toxic effects such as eye and skin
irritation as well as affects on the circulatory system."
“My sons and I were surprised when we saw a plane above our home.
As we looked up at the plane, the chemical material fell on us. At
that point I knew that it was poisonous, and I sent my sons inside.
Even so, the material still fell on my house as well as the houses
of my cousins, with women and children inside. 100 sheep also came
in contact with the poison. This is our land, and we have never
received a demolition order. At the last meeting with the ILA
(Israel Lands Administration), they told me that this is not my
land, but I inherited it from my grandfathers. How could they come
and destroy my crops without any notice?”
Suleiman al-Farawny
Derived from Translations from the Arab Press, Arab Human Rights
Association. Adalah, Land, Law and Planning – Recent Cases. 30
March 2004. For more on the Bedouin in the Naqab see, The Regional
Council for the Unrecognized Villages of the Palestinian Bedouin in
the Negev (RCUV), www.arabhra.org/rcuv/index.htm or email:
[email protected].